Central CAC Votes Against Rezoning Cases

Print More

The Central Citizens Advisory Council voted against two separate rezoning cases Monday – one for a restaurant, the other a city-owned parking lot.

The parking lot is a piece of city-owned property on the corner of Hillsborough and Morgan Streets downtown.

301 Hillsborough was once home to a city office building

Wake County

301 Hillsborough was once home to a city office building

Raleigh’s Interim Planning Director Ken Bowers told the CAC that the space at 301 Hillsborough was once home to a city office building where staff orientations, including his own, had been held. It was demolished in 2007.

Bowers said two previous site plans had been approved for the property after the demolition – a 34-story mixed-use and a 24-story mixed-use. Due to economic conditions at the time, the developers pulled out.

At the end of 2013, Bowers said, the city was approached by two entities interested in purchasing the property, which is valued at $3,080,000. State statutes limit the ability of municipalities to dispose of the land it owns, and in this case the city decided to go with an upset bid process.

For most public bids, like the recent one for the demolition of the Milner Inn, the city announces a due date, sealed proposals are turned in and all opened at once, publicly. The lowest responsible bidder is later awarded by the city council.

With upset bids, the city proposes to accept an offer for city-owned property, a notice of the offer is published, and any interested parties may submit a higher bid within 10 days of the notice. The city then re-advertises the offer at the increased price, and bidders once again have 10 days to submit a higher price. This process continues until no further qualifying bids are received.

Prior to putting out the bid, Bowers said, the city wanted to rezone the property, which would remove many uncertainties and put all potential bidders on an even playing field in terms of allowed uses for the property. The requested rezoning would allow for a maximum of 20 stories and require ground-floor retail. Any development plans, then, would be reviewed administratively.

301 Hillsborough today serves as a parking lot

Wake County

301 Hillsborough today serves as a parking lot

At 20 stories, the new development would be significantly larger than any existing structures in the neighborhood.

Jon Kolkin, a member of the Homeowners Association for the nearby Dawson on Morgan condominium community, noted the development, if built to its maximum height, would be “10 times larger and 10 times higher” than the average building in the neighborhood.

“To put a 20-story building here would be mammothly out of scale with our neighborhood,” Kolkin said.

The goal of the HOA in this case, Kolkin said, was to take approval of the rezoning off the “fast-track,” and cap the maximum height at seven stories. Additionally, the HOA requested that the city disallow on West Morgan Street a parking entrance/exit for the property as well as outdoor seating for a bar/restaurant, as both would be disruptive to the neighborhood.

A vote was called for on Kolkin’s proposal, and it was approved unanimously by the CAC. City staff will take this feedback into account, although it is unlikely their application will be amended to include the requests outlined in the proposal.

A photo of the former Seventh Day Adventist Church in 2013

Wake County

A photo of the former Seventh Day Adventist Church in 2013

The restaurant case heard by the CAC was for the redevelopment of the former Gethsemane Seventh Day Adventist Church at 501 South Person Street.

Central CAC Chair Lonnette Williams said there had been some inconsistencies in what neighbors had been hearing from the owner of the property and what they had been hearing from the potential tenant for the space. Neither the owner nor the tenant elected to appear at the CAC meeting.

Williams said while most didn’t object to the idea of a restaurant operating in the space, many in the area had a problem with said restaurant obtaining an ABC permit.

The main problems, she said, were the two childcare centers in close proximity to the property and the fact that it was located in a historic district.

“Selling alcohol in a Seventh Day Adventist Church doesn’t seem consistent with preserving the African-American heritage in that building,” Williams said

Adherents to the Seventh Day Adventist faith do not drink or smoke.

The CAC voted against approving the restaurant’s rezoning request, and while this will not prevent the project from moving forward, the applicant will still need to appear before the Planning Commission and receive approval from city council.

The church in 1996

Wake County

The church in 1996

6 thoughts on “Central CAC Votes Against Rezoning Cases

  1. “To put a 20-story building here would be mammothly out of scale with our neighborhood,” Kolkin said.

    Really? Is this person blind or just dumb? The Holiday Inn right across from this lot is 20 stories. People like that shouldn’t be living downtown. This person also claims restaurants with outdoor seating would be a detriment to the area. What does he think the Borough is? I guess that doesn’t count since it is in the building this person lives in. The NIMBYs need to move back out to North Raleigh or Johnston County where they belong.

  2. Ha, and there are people who say NIMBYs are not a problem around here.

    I guess its a good thing that Sandreuter didn’t get to build what he originally set out to do for the Dawson at Morgan. Might have scared Mr. Kolkin due to its height.

  3. This is a classic example of why downtown and Raleigh as a whole wont completely escape the “Mayberry” feel it has. I understand that communities should be involved in some capacity of city planing but it brings politics on the table more than it does constructive criticism. Common sense doesn’t seem to be common anymore. The city’s future plan is to make downtown into a more vibrant, livable, and fun place to be and to not allowing outdoor seating seems to be too much. Sometimes how its done is more important than if its done. This isn’t the suburbs, its downtown Raleigh. Being able to enter and exit on the same side of your building or have outdoor seating -which I’m thinking wouldn’t be smart anyway to have outdoor seating right next to cars entering or exiting the building due to safety concerns- shouldn’t be “disruptive” to your living experience. This reminds me of recent stories of people complaining about noise in Glenwood South. This just in: ITS DOWNTOWN, GLENWOOD SOUTH OF ALL PLACES. Not saying that a noisy atmosphere should always dominate the neighborhood, but understand that its not the suburbs and that its probably going to get worst with more development coming in an area that the city WANTS to make more vibrant. I also suspect that the height of buildings beyond little ol’ Dawson on Morgan should be capped at 7 stories just because Dawson on Morgan is 7 stories tall. Can’t believe this condo community has essentially started a 7 story domino effect throughout that area. If they can get special treatment on what and how buildings are built around them, then why can’t future developments do the same? Where does it end?

  4. The CAC vote will not stop the City from allowing the height. This site will be a tall building.

  5. John Kolkin can move to Cary any time if he doesn’t like tall buildings. Downtown Raleigh is probably not for him (and he should stop trying to reshape downtown Raleigh into his own pet Mayberry… there are plenty–too many–places in the triangle he’d be comfortable. at least leave those of us who like cities and density SOMEWHERE to build high)

  6. Since when does a tall building north of another building impede any light from getting to that building in the northern hemisphere?

    Glad the comments are pretty unanimous that this is absurd.

    The arguments aren’t real, it’s about preserving property values for the little clique who live in that building. Sorry you’re living in the only viable growth area for density downtown. (See being against a restaurant that’s 1 story high 3 blocks from Fayetteville street also in this CAC action.)

    Both the tower (2/3 it’s originally proposed height) and the restaurant would be allowed without question in the new zoning code.